I saw the new concept art this morning and it occurred to me that I have seen something very similar before... in one of Py Gerbeau's previous project locations. Before the O2 arena became successful the Millennium Dome (it's the same building for those of you who may not know) was a massive failure. Huge tourist attraction built on old industrial land in an area nobody valued, it now has thousands of apartments surrounding it, a rail link on the London tube network and is a destination for locals and tourists. It looks suspiciously like the new artwork coming out of the London Resort.
This new "concept art" literally features no theme park at all, unless you count the tiny scribble of a roller coaster and castle (?!) in the background of the first image. It shows housing, transport infrastructure and landscaping for external parts but no new concept art of the park and this press release was exclusively sent to a tourist publication - with no real reference to any tourist attraction? This doesn't make any sense to me at all.
Image 1: Concept art released today on the left and actual images from Greenwich Peninsula on the right, note even the shape of the canopies shown in the concept which mirror the tube station and cable car station from Greenwich.
Image 2: This is the land for Greenwich and the O2 arena on the left and the land for The London Resort on the right. When the Dome was built the area in Greenwich was very similar to the land in Kent today, lots of old warehousing, docks and old industrial land.
The fact that Py left the Millennium Dome project when it failed and was never involved in the actual success of the O2 arena is irrelevant to the London Resort project in my opinion. The success of the O2 is in the creation of a destination with increased land value and thousands of apartments in an area of London that 15 years ago housed a failed tourist attraction and land nobody wanted to live on.
Concept Art from Blooloop